Search  Search by username            Help   Home 
Not logged in - Login | Register 

The Physics Diet
 Moderated by: Nir  
 New Topic   Reply   Print 
AuthorPost
JSABD
Distinguished Member


Joined: 10 April 2011
Location: Blimpville, USA
Posts: 865
 Posted: 11 August 2011 09:06 pm
 Quote  Reply 
http://muller.lbl.gov/TRessays/22-ThePhysicsDiet.htm

The Physics Diet

 

Want to lose weight? Easy! Just remember the first law of thermodynamics: conservation of energy.

 

by Richard A. Muller

Technology for Presidents

November 14, 2003

 
Here's an old joke. The dairy industry hires a physicist to improve milk production. After several weeks, he's ready to lecture about his progress. He draws a circle on the blackboard and says, 'Consider a spherical cow.'
 I've told this joke many times, but nobody ever laughs -- except other physicists. For the rest of you, I should explain that it is self-deprecating humor. It makes fun of our penchant for oversimplification.
 This month I want to talk about diet and exercise for weight loss, and I'm going to oversimplify on purpose. Consider a spherical physicist.
 Most dieters are so concerned about second-order effects, such as daily fluctuations in weight and changes in metabolism, that they lose track of the first law of thermodynamics: conservation of energy.
 Want to lose a pound of fat? You can work it off by hiking to the top of a 2,500-story building. Or by running 60 miles. Or by spending 7 hours cleaning animal stalls. (It is amazing what scientists have actually measured. This last example is tabulated in the book Exercise Physiology by G. Brooks and T. Fahey.)
 Exercise is a very difficult way to lose weight. Here's a rule of thumb: exercise very hard for one hour (swimming, running, or racquetball)– and you'll lose about one ounce of fat. Light exercise for an hour (gardening, baseball, or golf) will lose you a third of an ounce.  That number is small because fat is a very energy-dense substance: it packs about 4,000 food calories per pound, the same as gasoline, and 15 times as much as in TNT.
 If you run for an hour, you'll lose that ounce of fat and also a pound or two of water. By the next day, when you've replenished the water, you might think, 'the weight came right back!' But you'd be wrong -- you really did lose an ounce. It is hard to notice, unless you keep running every day for a month or more, and don't reward yourself after each run with a cookie.
 There is a much easier way to lose weight, as we can learn from the first law of thermodynamics. Eat less.
 A reasonable daily diet for an adult is 2,000 food calories. That's 8.36 megajoules per day, or about 100 joules per second -- in other words, 100 watts.  Most of that ends up as heat, so you warm a room as much as a bright light bulb. Cut your consumption by 600 calories per day and you'll lose a pound of fat every week. Most diet experts consider that a reasonable goal. Don't drop below 1,000 calories per day, or you might get lethargic. But at 1,400 calories per day, you can easily maintain an active life.
 Of course, there is a catch. You'll be hungry.
 It's not real hunger–not like the painful hunger of starving people in impoverished countries. It's more of a mild ache, or an itch that you mustn't scratch. To be popular, a diet must somehow cope with this hunger. Weight Watchers does it with peer support. The food pyramid does it by encouraging you to eat unlimited celery. Some high-fat diets satisfy all your old cravings -- and figure you'll eventually cut back the butter you put on your bacon.
 Last April, I had once again grown out of my belt. I wasn't grossly overweight: 205 pounds in a six-foot, one-inch body.  That wouldn't be bad for a football player, but I'm 59 years old, and the excess pounds weren't in muscle. I had gained a pound a year for several decades. I felt heavy and old. I decided to try conservation of energy. I gave up lunch and snacks.
 How to cope with the hunger? I attempted to enjoy it. I thought of the movie Lawrence of Arabia, in which T.E. Lawrence says, 'The trick is not minding that it hurts.' I told myself that the mild ache was only the sensation of evaporating fat. That interpretation has some basis in physics. When you lose weight, most of your fat is converted to the gases carbon dioxide and water vapor, and so you get rid of fat by breathing it out of your body.
 Physics works, and I lost weight. By August, I was down to 175 pounds, a 30-pound drop. My belt went from 42 inches to 36 inches.  My Zen-like approach to hunger also worked; I found myself declining offers of chocolate cake because I didn't want to lose the sensation of evaporation. I didn't change my level of activity, and managed to maintain my diet while taking trips to Cuba and Alaska -- and during  a week-long backpacking excursion in the Sierra Nevada. A key innovation: I kept up the social aspects of lunch, without eating. I watched others gobbling cheeseburgers, while I sipped diet cola. It really wasn't that hard to do. And the mild afternoon discomfort was compensated by several positive developments. Dinner became truly wonderful. I hadn't had pre-dinner hunger for decades. A sharp appetite turns a meal into a feast. No more cheese 'appetizers' for me.
 Moreover -- and this may sound silly coming from a physicist -- I was surprised that I began to feel lighter. I no longer walk down streets -- I float. Distant stores seem closer. And my knees have responded to the lighter load. Their aching, which I had mistakenly attributed to aging, went away.
 Food is instant gratification. And fast-food chains and gourmet restaurants serve tasty food at remarkably low cost. It is a situation unprecedented in history and unanticipated by our genes. No wonder we are overweight.
 Anybody can lose weight. Energy is conserved. Just stop scratching that itch. Of course, you'll have to sacrifice instant gratification. Is it worth it? You decide. Food is delicious and cheap. You might reasonably choose to take advantage of this unique historical circumstance, and decide to be fat.
 It's been seven months since I started my diet, and two months since I left it. I've begun eating a light lunch, and having an occasional small snack. I'm still at 175. But I never want to lose the delicious edge of hunger before dinner, or the floating sensation when I walk. Moving takes less energy now, so I have more energy. I no longer feel like a spherical physicist. And for losing weight, dieting sure beats cleaning animal stalls.
-------------------
Richard A. Muller, a 1982 MacArthur Fellow, is a physics professor at the University of California, Berkeley, where he teaches a course called 'Physics for Future Presidents.' Since 1972, he has been a Jason consultant on U.S. national security

Tankgirl
Distinguished Member


Joined: 1 July 2011
Location:  
Posts: 538
 Posted: 11 August 2011 11:36 pm
 Quote  Reply 
I guess it's OK for people that don't like to exercise. I've been reading about Toxic Hunger, and not quite sure about it. I've had days where I haven't eaten enough calories and tried to ride, and barely made it to the next stop. Light- headed and weak is NOT good when you're riding in traffic.

JSABD
Distinguished Member


Joined: 10 April 2011
Location: Blimpville, USA
Posts: 865
 Posted: 12 August 2011 12:20 am
 Quote  Reply 
When I was training hard I would workout on an empty stomach and once a broke through the wall I would have all sorts of energy. The theory at the time was protein starvation. Then you would take a munch of amino acids and carbs. Not sure if it worked. I can go for hours without eating and still have lots of energy. I guess my blood sugar is quite stable.

I have also read that it is ok to eat 1 or 2 big meals and I think I agree with that but everyone is different. The nutritional plan that I advocate for weight loss is 6 meals a day. There are many reasons for that.

Bamagirly
Senior Member


Joined: 6 December 2010
Location: Small Town, Alabama USA
Posts: 139
 Posted: 12 August 2011 01:45 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Kudos to him, but without exercise he has done his body a great disservice.  But that is all I can say because I admit myself that I love to exercise much more than I can tolerate skipping a meal.

Tankgirl
Distinguished Member


Joined: 1 July 2011
Location:  
Posts: 538
 Posted: 12 August 2011 09:13 pm
 Quote  Reply 
Unless I'm really low, it's not so much the weakness that worries me. It's something that the article describes and I've read in people that participate in CRON, that I've noticed in myself if My calories are too low on a busy day. Things seem dream-like, and it feels a little like being on a painkiller.I'm afraid I might do something stupid and dangerous in that state - especially with the way people drive around here. Now If I was on an elliptical in that state, it might be interesting, especially with some Velvet Underground or Pink Floyd!

Last edited on 12 August 2011 09:15 pm by Tankgirl

giselleB
New Member


Joined: 17 August 2011
Location:  
Posts: 4
 Posted: 17 August 2011 07:41 am
 Quote  Reply 
Dieting and physical exercise are the mainstays of treatment for obesity to lose weight. The physics diet is of great help too.


 Current time is 07:07 am



Copyright wowwBB 2007-2008